> > Actually, in my opinion that is exactly what web.py is; "a developper > using his own framework". Except that it is not one developper but a lot of > us, making our own frameworks, customized for every web application. >
Unfortunately, I don't believe that was the tone the originator was using.. But well put and I agree! As for my previous request on the status of `teh communicator`, I was just the second official download of the 0.01 of seddit<http://code.google.com/p/seddit/>which is the Google SOC project I was really looking for. Sooo, Aaron, is it usable and are there plans for a hosted instance @ webpy.org? On 8/25/07, bubblboy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Tzury wrote: > > What I didn't like was a comment of Resig reffer to web.py as one > > programmer using his own framework. That is a minimizing action for > > "great framework for those who hates framework" > > Actually, in my opinion that is exactly what web.py is; "a developper > using his own framework". Except that it is not one developper but a lot > of us, making our own frameworks, customized for every web application. > I prefer web.py to most other frameworks because I can think of a > website as a real python program, not as a "django program" or anything. > Maybe I am just repeating statements, but to me this comment describes > very well what web.py is about. > > I hope I did not offend anyone by expressing myself this way ;) no harm > intended. > > Greetings, > b^4 > > > > -- Angelo Gladding [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://angelogladding.com (626) 755 - 1417 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web.py" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/webpy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
