On Saturday 14 February 2009 22:40:59 adelevie wrote: > I'm someone who has been spoiled by Django's ORM. It's so simple > compared to the others. I tried learning SQLAlchemy and found that > there was so much extra stuff to code that didn't really pertain to > my models. All I want is to define models, attributes (and > datatypes) and foreignkeys. I'd be willing to contrib my noob > skillz to making such a library if anyone with more expertise is on > board. SA now has declarative style, but u'll still have to declare the mappers separately. There's also Elixir on top of SA, which i think does the mappers; and i have the dbcook.sf.net over SA, in which the SQL stuff is nearly not mentioned, all is under the hood. so u can choose... but imo None of these should come here. why there should be yet another django/turbogears/whatever-full-stack thing?
> On Feb 13, 5:47 pm, bloofa <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Feb 5, 5:52 am, Stuart Colville <[email protected]> wrote: > > > If you're using sqlalchemy you may want to look at form > > > alchemyhttp://code.google.com/p/formalchemy/ > > > > Thanks, this looks interesting. As Adelevie said though, > > sometimes it would be good to avoid SQL Alchemy for simple > > database structures. > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web.py" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/webpy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
