http://dbcook.sf.net svn co https://dbcook.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/dbcook/trunk no much documenation, sorry
On Monday 16 February 2009 04:44:08 adelevie wrote: > What is a dbcook? > > On Feb 15, 5:14 pm, [email protected] wrote: > > have not tried yet. > > in any case it would be via SA, no matter through which > > syntax-automater - most probably my own dbcook as i hate them SQL > > details, and it might allow me to work onto google-db as well - > > eh, whenever i code that backend. > > > > On Sunday 15 February 2009 23:58:41 adelevie wrote: > > > web.py is much simpler than Django. However Django's ORM is > > > still far easier to work with, IMO than web.py's. I don't think > > > it's a fair statement to say that adding a single Django-esque > > > feature constitutes a path down the slippery slope of full > > > blown Django-transformation. > > > > > > I'm jw, how do you database with web.py? Sqlobject? Alchemy? > > > the built in db wrapper? > > > > > > On Feb 14, 5:00 pm, [email protected] wrote: > > > > On Saturday 14 February 2009 22:40:59 adelevie wrote:> I'm > > > > someone who has been spoiled by Django's ORM. It's so simple > > > > > > > > > compared to the others. I tried learning SQLAlchemy and > > > > > found that there was so much extra stuff to code that > > > > > didn't really pertain to my models. All I want is to define > > > > > models, attributes (and datatypes) and foreignkeys. I'd be > > > > > willing to contrib my noob skillz to making such a library > > > > > if anyone with more expertise is on board. > > > > > > > > SA now has declarative style, but u'll still have to declare > > > > the mappers separately. There's also Elixir on top of SA, > > > > which i think does the mappers; and i have the dbcook.sf.net > > > > over SA, in which the SQL stuff is nearly not mentioned, all > > > > is under the hood. so u can choose... > > > > but imo None of these should come here. why there should be > > > > yet another django/turbogears/whatever-full-stack thing? > > > > > > > > > On Feb 13, 5:47 pm, bloofa <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > On Feb 5, 5:52 am, Stuart Colville > > > > > > <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > If you're using sqlalchemy you may want to look at form > > > > > > > alchemyhttp://code.google.com/p/formalchemy/ > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, this looks interesting. As Adelevie said though, > > > > > > sometimes it would be good to avoid SQL Alchemy for > > > > > > simple database structures. > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web.py" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/webpy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
