What is a dbcook?
On Feb 15, 5:14 pm, [email protected] wrote:
> have not tried yet.
> in any case it would be via SA, no matter through which
> syntax-automater - most probably my own dbcook as i hate them SQL
> details, and it might allow me to work onto google-db as well - eh,
> whenever i code that backend.
>
> On Sunday 15 February 2009 23:58:41 adelevie wrote:
>
> > web.py is much simpler than Django. However Django's ORM is still
> > far easier to work with, IMO than web.py's. I don't think it's a
> > fair statement to say that adding a single Django-esque feature
> > constitutes a path down the slippery slope of full blown
> > Django-transformation.
>
> > I'm jw, how do you database with web.py? Sqlobject? Alchemy? the
> > built in db wrapper?
>
> > On Feb 14, 5:00 pm, [email protected] wrote:
> > > On Saturday 14 February 2009 22:40:59 adelevie wrote:> I'm
> > > someone who has been spoiled by Django's ORM. It's so simple
>
> > > > compared to the others. I tried learning SQLAlchemy and found
> > > > that there was so much extra stuff to code that didn't really
> > > > pertain to my models. All I want is to define models,
> > > > attributes (and datatypes) and foreignkeys. I'd be willing to
> > > > contrib my noob skillz to making such a library if anyone with
> > > > more expertise is on board.
>
> > > SA now has declarative style, but u'll still have to declare the
> > > mappers separately. There's also Elixir on top of SA, which i
> > > think does the mappers; and i have the dbcook.sf.net over SA, in
> > > which the SQL stuff is nearly not mentioned, all is under the
> > > hood. so u can choose...
> > > but imo None of these should come here. why there should be yet
> > > another django/turbogears/whatever-full-stack thing?
>
> > > > On Feb 13, 5:47 pm, bloofa <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > On Feb 5, 5:52 am, Stuart Colville <[email protected]>
>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > If you're using sqlalchemy you may want to look at form
> > > > > > alchemyhttp://code.google.com/p/formalchemy/
>
> > > > > Thanks, this looks interesting. As Adelevie said though,
> > > > > sometimes it would be good to avoid SQL Alchemy for simple
> > > > > database structures.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"web.py" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/webpy?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
