On Sunday, January 2, 2011 11:32:19 AM UTC+11, GothAlice wrote: > > > I'm not yet intimate with the details of WSGI so I've learned a great > > deal already just by hearing that a PEP 444 exists. To clarify, PEP > > 3333 is `WSGI 1.1` and PEP 444 is `web3`, correct? Would it be > > accurate to say that your server supports `web3` rather than `WSGI 2`? > > After some discussion on the Web-SIG mailing list, PEP 444 is now > "officially" WSGI 2, and PEP 3333 is WSGI 1.1. > Stop repeating that, it is not true despite what you reckon.
For a start PEP 3333 is still WSGI 1.0. Read the specification and it says that wsgi.version is still 1.0. And as I have said before PEP 444 does not have have any official blessing as being WSGI 2.0. The only thing people were happy for you to do was to take PEP 444 and develop the idea further. The silence of the people on the Python WEB-SIG whose opinion matters does not constitute approval for you to commandeer the WSGI 2.0 moniker. Graham -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web.py" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/webpy?hl=en.
