Python WEB-SIG whose opinion matters does not constitute approval for you to
commandeer the WSGI 2.0 moniker.
Graham, look at the Web. Most of the "standards" on today's Web were
first implemented or specified by people who did NOT have the consent
of the people and institutions "whose opinion matters". WHATWG, most
notable example lately, started out just like web3, and their work is
now standard in HTML5.
In the end you can only standardize stuff that EXISTS, so "opinions"
don't really count. Work counts. Code counts.
See also the thread where the choice of names for PEP 444 (web3 vs.
wsgi2) are discussed and WSGI 2 chosen by community discussion:
http://bit.ly/epyP6j
This might not be a large enough segment of the population to make
everyone happy, but it's enough for me to be able to move past it and
concentrate on actual technical issues.
- Alice.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"web.py" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/webpy?hl=en.
