On 2012-08-11 23:02, qinmugong wrote: > i think webpy is less active than other framework like django or flask .i > use webpy for a while and i really like the way it works, just have a > little of worry about the future of webpy!
The fact that web.py is "less active" is a major advantage for me. web.py does more or less what it should, so I'm happy that my application will (hopefully) not break tomorrow, when there is an important bug fix. Python 3 support is desirable, IMHO. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web.py" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/webpy?hl=en.
