On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Chris Weber <[email protected]> wrote: > In section 4 step 5 what was intended by "idna-canonicalization"? > > 5. Let uri-host be the idna-canonicalization of the host component > of the URI. > > Are implementers to choose whether to apply IDNA2003, IDNA2008, or TR46 in > determining the canonical form? If so should the reference to section 10.1 > be made here?
We should reference 10.1. This tail isn't going to wag the IDNA dog. Adam _______________________________________________ websec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec
