On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Adam Barth <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Chris Weber <[email protected]> wrote: >> In section 4 step 5 what was intended by "idna-canonicalization"? >> >> 5. Let uri-host be the idna-canonicalization of the host component >> of the URI. >> >> Are implementers to choose whether to apply IDNA2003, IDNA2008, or TR46 in >> determining the canonical form? If so should the reference to section 10.1 >> be made here? > > We should reference 10.1. This tail isn't going to wag the IDNA dog.
Actually, I misspoke. The idna-canonicalization is a defined algorithm in the spec (which eventually references 10.1). I need to go through and make sure all the reference point to the right things. Adam _______________________________________________ websec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec
