Laurent Blume wrote: > As a general answer, I'm sure that information should be on the front > pages of the respective sites.
Yes - we get far too many 2008.11-specific bugs filed at bugs.opensolaris.org because it's the obvious URL and nothing there points to the other site. The filing bugs page at http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/indiana/resources/reporting_bugs/ is an excellent recent addition, but it needs to be linked to from the bugs.os.o & defects.os.o front pages. >> defect.opensolaris.org: >> distribution > opensolaris > i18n-l10n >> >> bugs.opensolaris.org: >> Select the category for the component with the problem, such as utility >> or library, then the appropriate l10n-* category, such as l10n-europe or >> l10n-asia. > > Thanks, you're very right about that, it seems my own notes were wrong. > I'm afraid the categories aren't very consistent, though. Why so much > difference between Nevada and Indiana? The categories on defect.os.o are temporary placeholders until we get farther along in the migration from the old bug system to the new one and decide if we want to just copy the current categories or refactor them. Unfortunately, the person leading the bug migration project has been slightly distracted for the last year or two by also leading the new packaging system project and being one of the leads on the Indiana project. > And overall, it's very complicated to find the place to report a bug. Is > that a deliberate choice? No, that's a horrible bug in itself. -- -Alan Coopersmith- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering _______________________________________________ website-discuss mailing list [email protected]
