On 11 Nov 2008, at 12:45, timeless wrote: > On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 2:11 PM, Laurent Blume <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: >> I'd like to request some clarification about the respective roles of >> bugs.opensolaris.org and defect.opensolaris.org. >> I was trying to update properly the g11n-fr page, and suddeny >> realized >> that I had only a vague idea of what either are doing. > > I can't really help here. > > My hope was that new components in Indiana would be tracked in d.o.o > and that b.o.o would be mostly for legacy components. But I'm not > currently affiliated with Sun (or really OpenSolaris other than as a > user), so it's just a personal hope.
The general plan at the moment AIUI is that opensolaris[1] bugs go into defect.opensolaris.org, while bugs that also (or only) exist in the SXCE/Nevada product go into bugs.opensolaris.org, which is a front end to Sun's internal bug database. As such, you'll see some bugs in defect.opensolaris.org being closed as "Tracked in Bugster" (Sun's internal bug database), which means they were found to be reproducible in SXCE/Nevada. Cheeri, Calum. [1] In all senses of the word-- the binary distro (aka Indiana), the source code, and community infrastructure like the website and mailing lists. -- CALUM BENSON, Usability Engineer Sun Microsystems Ireland mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] GNOME Desktop Team http://blogs.sun.com/calum +353 1 819 9771 Any opinions are personal and not necessarily those of Sun Microsystems _______________________________________________ website-discuss mailing list [email protected]
