Hi Narayan, Mike, :-) For the present, you need to take account of the fact that work on the website is currently being led by a four-person team: myself for content, Ivan and Christoph as regards design (CSS, graphics), and Christian. Therefore, these people have to be in agreement about the decisions on developing the site. In turn, we implement the guidelines and decisions of the SC. The SC is the final owner of the site, in its role as custodian and federator of the community.
Therefore, no action or decisions are possible without consulting all of the above people, with the SC having final veto. You can certainly approach the SC and request a change as regards the four-man team. For that, the best thing would be to come up with a document laying out your ideas, and then to request an agenda item before an SC meeting, so that the issue can be discussed and voted on at the following meeting. In that case, you should be there at the meeting, and I think you'd probably be asked to vocally present your case. But the SC will, in any case, always be the ultimate owner and decision-taker as regards the website. That's the way it is and, in my opinion, the way it should be. Mike, you listened to my ideas during the last confcall, so you have a pretty good idea where I stand about all that. ;-) Guys, it would be so much better if we could move on past these discussions about the raison d'être of the website team. It would be so much easier to possibly achieve a good number of the things you want, if we could work together contructively as a team and committed members of the project, putting our support behind the project governance and making a positive net contribution to the project. Shouldn't we just get back to work on the site content? ;-) David Nelson -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/website/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
