Good enough. I don't have any issues with the SC decision at all. In fact, this same unequivocal reply should have come two months ago.
As I said in my first mail, we should not be forced to second-guess the SC's intent. Unfortunately, that is exactly what we have been doing because SC's message was not clear earlier. For that matter, the appointment of the as website team also came as a surprise. This was not announced through the most obvious channel (in this mail list). The information trickled through David as part of another discussion, which is very strange. Let us hope the organizational announcements are made more gracefully in future. -Narayan > Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 08:38:40 +0100 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: [libreoffice-website] Re: Libreoffice.org website dev sitrep > 2011-02-02 - [Was: Work on the "Why?" pages] > > Hello Narayan, everyone, > > Just a reminder: > > We will not consider any move to another CMS, platform, etc. until at least 6 > months. At that stage (in 6 months or so) we might/may perhaps *consider* > (not necessarily approve) a move to a platform such as Drupal. > > Until that stage: > 1) no discussion about Drupal on this list. > 2) no "major overhaul" of the website. > > What this does not mean: > 1) we can't change the way some of the content is presented on the website. > (see the wiki page for this) > 2) we can't improve the website in minor ways. > 3) we can't fix bugs. > > > Yes, there comes a time when the website is "completed" and where only > incremental improvements are needed. > Again: LibreOffice is not about a website nor about letting people satisfy > their passion about web design, at least not primarily. We do not want a > website that keeps on changing because people think their way is better. > We (the SC) do not want to reopen yet another thread about these topics. The > level of energy and effort spent on this topic (the website) is ridiculously > high compared to what we need to to work on. We're therefore glad that there > are people who want to help but there comes a point where it's not helpful, > because someone's always pushing, pushing and always pushing. Same thing with > respect to the website confcall: we haven't agreed on working again on > overhauling the website, we haven't agreed on changing the website team, > which for the sake of clarity is composed of the same 4 people the SC has > appointed. > > Thank you, > > -- > charles.h.schulz > Sent with Sparrow > > > -- > Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] > List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/website/ > *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity *** -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/website/ *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
