Italo Vignoli wrote: > On 6/19/11 11:25 AM, Marc Paré wrote: > > Could you suggest another description that we could use that would be > > more appropriate for us? > I think that we should use "free software license, preferably copyleft"
Just "free software license" linked to http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html would exactly match with the RMS quote on http://www.documentfoundation.org/supporters/ and would include both free-permissive licenses (Apache) and free-copyleft licenses (LGPL). Anything else would be a new interpretation of the original statement and would exclude (or discourage) some free software from the extensions repository, but of course the Steering Committee is free to decide on the policy of the LibreOffice websites regardless of RMS's quotes from months ago. Regards, Andrea. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
