Hi Robinson, Am 13.08.2014 um 18:28 schrieb Robinson Tryon: > On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 4:54 AM, Florian Effenberger > <flo...@documentfoundation.org> wrote: >> Robinson Tryon schrieb am 2014-08-12 um 22:50: >>> Would it make sense to build some functionality into this website to >>> handle version compatibility, or should we just file bugs in redmine >>> against particular extensions? >> I propose to link to the author's mail address. It doesn't make much sense >> to link to Redmine, when the authors don't use it. :-) > Sure, that makes sense. Here's an example of the current workflow that > I'm hoping to address: > https://redmine.documentfoundation.org/issues/603 > > I think there needs to be a better mechanism for QA (and others) to > identify and flag/update extensions that have fallen-behind in > development. I got this ticket but the extension is flagged for LibreOffice 3.5 and 3.6 only. If there is something broken with that versions it would be an issue.
If someone wants to work on that extension and create a new release for LibreOffice 4.2 or 4.3 I'm happy to assist with the extensions-site. But I think it's not a good idea to delist/delete etc. an extension that is flagged for an older version of LibreOffice. It may also be an issue from the license perspective (depends on the license): Regards, Andreas -- ## Developer LibreOffice ## Freie Office-Suite für Linux, Mac, Windows ## http://LibreOffice.org ## Support the Document Foundation (http://documentfoundation.org) ## Meine Seite: http://www.amantke.de -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: website+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
