mattdm added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` > I see docs.fp.o still a website with a lot of work in progress (links > changed, CSS has to be fixed, the website is only partially mobile-friendly, > no responsive tags for images, etc)
There's definitely room for improvement. > Why should we redirect to a sort of overview with just Council links? Seems > to me like redirecting to a smaller wiki page. FInally, are users who are > looking for Fedora, searching informations about the Council? I'm not sure I understand. I'm suggesting redirecting to https://docs.fedoraproject.org/fedora-project/project/fedora-overview.html. The Council docs are findable on the left, but under a different section, starting with https://docs.fedoraproject.org/fedora-project/council/charter.html > Btw, can anyone tell me why the images on the docs pages have soooooooo long > paths? For whatever reason, asciibinder turns images into inline data. We'd have to ask the asciibinder authors about that. > @duffy no, it seems it is using : > <!-- Bootstrap --> > <link rel="stylesheet" > href="https://maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com/bootstrap/3.3.5/css/bootstrap.min.css";> > <link rel="stylesheet" > href="https://maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com/bootstrap/3.3.5/css/bootstrap-theme.min.css";> This comes from upstream asciibinder. I tried dropping in the Fedora bootstrap fork, but it caused a lot of problems (images misaligned, the whole thing being undifferentiated gray, etc.). @bex is talking to @ryanlerch about possibly using Fedora's bootstrap instead of the upstream one, but there would need to be some tweaks. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/fedora-websites/issue/756 _______________________________________________ websites mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
