Jyri Virkki wrote: > Matt Ingenthron wrote: > >> I figured that, but what "works" and what is designed to work with the >> client/server of different versions is what I wasn't sure about. >> > > It needs to go with the formally documented-to-work choice. >
Obviously :) I just wasn't sure if Sriram was suggesting 5.1 because it is a/the documented-to-work choice or not. To me it'd be a bit anti-intuitive for a 5.1 client to necessarily support a 5.0 server, but I don't know what the compatibility support is across versions. - Matt
