Jyri Virkki wrote: > > > > Do you know why it ended up in /var/apache2/build originally? Was that > > > just a mistake? > > > > I don't know the reason why the build directory was placed under > > /var/apache2 directory. Stefan, do you know the reason ? > > I just read through the materials and discussion of the previous > apache2 case (2004/676) and there isn't any coverage of the build > directory, it just showed up under /var. I'll check if the submitter > of that case has any recollection about this topic.
I checked with the submitter of 2004/676 and his response was: > If the build directory is indeed static, then there is no reason > it can't move under /usr. At the time I integrated apache2, it > appeared to me that perhaps there were things in that directory that > could get customized on a per-machine basis. If I assumed invorrectly, > than that's my fault that it ended up in /var. So, looks like it can definitely be in /usr now that Seema has confirmed there is no reason for the contents to change. -- Jyri J. Virkki - jyri.virkki at sun.com - Sun Microsystems
