Jyri Virkki wrote: > I went through all the Apache threads so far this afternoon to > summarize the current state of discussion, here is where I believe > things stand: > > - The next case will support both worker and prefork MPM. I believe > we have closure on this. Seema has posted details on the delivery. > > - Configuration of MPM choice. Seema, can you summarize the answer? > > - Closure on file layout versioning. The 2007/169 case had > /usr/apache2 (and corresponding places in /etc and /var). There's > been much discussion on whether to stay the course or permit minor > releases of 2.x to coexist (and there are several way to accomplish > that, but the higher order question is whether coexistence is the goal). > The main argument for this appears to be for upgrades, so that upgrading > from S10 doesn't break a working installation. > > - There was discussion of adding a 'build' directory. Closure? > > - There were various proposals on directory name changes (modules, > conf.d) but the consensus was that names should not change unless > there is a strong reason. So I believe there is closure on existing > names (libexec, extras). > > > Is there a consensus on shipping a default httpd.conf file as part of the default installation ?
I would still urge to consider bundling a standard 'conf.d' with httpd.conf including sub configurations underneath this location. This seems to be common practice across other httpd distributors. So, I wonder why we cannot retain this behavior within SXDE as well. - sriram
