Matt Ingenthron wrote: > That, and I felt it needed to be said that in previous discussion on > sfwnv-discuss, with some projects, it was pointed out that we may not > know (in part because we haven't asked) how/when they change > compatibility across releases or even patches, so the versioned layout > may require x.y or x.y.z or even x.y.z-a. > >
From what I've read so far, it does look like there is a need for the file layout to accommodate multiple versions of Apache. If there is consensus on this then what would happen to the existing 1.3.x and 2.0.x versions in /usr/apache and /usr/apache2? Would they continue to stay there or would they also be moved to the new layout? -Arvi
