[webstack-discuss] Summarizing Apache discussions so far (take 2)

[Arvind Srinivasan]

Jyri Virkki wrote:

  >
> IMO, #1 is not right. Introduces a lot of version clutter at the top 
> /usr level for a single component. Let's not.
+1.

> 
> #2 has the argument going for it that it follows previously approved
> practice (perl, PHP). The pesky detail is that there is already Apache
> 2.0 in /usr/apache2/.
> 
> 
EOF/EOL /usr/apache2 as suggested in
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=102001&#102001
and introduce /usr/apache2.x?

If you EOF/EOL /usr/apache2 for S10, can one reuse it in S11 with a 
perl/PHP-style directory structure?

Arvind