Thanks Chuck for checking out Redwire. Co-location is an option for me, although I think initially we'll continue on with Pair. I've grown used to their excellent service, and I don't have to think about spares or bandwidth. After the new app has been completed and I have some time to rest perhaps then I can look at other options. Or sleep.
Pair sure are a nice provider when it comes to lower cost, general purpose accounts - not all outfits provide access to compilers and custom cgi. Having said that, there are plenty of restrictions that Pair have in place to keep usage reasonable across the board, so paying attention to their terms and conditions up front is wise. But they are up front, straightforward and honest in everything they do, at least that's been my experience. > WhereAndWhatWeRunForProduction page Sounds like a terrific idea. Add site specific issues / notes to it, will surely save someone time down the road on systems stuff that could be better spend on design... ... or sleep! Mike At 11:19 AM 3/13/2002 -0800, Chuck Esterbrook wrote: >On Wednesday 13 March 2002 10:51 am, Chuck Esterbrook wrote: > > At my current company, we felt like it was cheaper to buy a server a > > co-locate it (at redwire.net; hmmm I see their web page now lists the > > price as "call us") because with QuickServe we would end up paying > > hundreds more per month for the lifetime of the server just to have > > extra RAM and hard drive space, a presumably one-time expense. > >I checked with redwire.net and they are still doing $150/month for a 1U >co-lo. I think there is a set up fee of $100. _______________________________________________ Webware-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-discuss
