On 3/18/07, Christoph Zwerschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jeremy Kaplan wrote: > > This is good stuff. Any idea when a 0.9.3 version will be available > > for use? I'd like to sneak this into my current schedule, but need to > > plan for managing risk, etc. > > There are still some issue on my list for the release, but I'm up to do > it very soon, maybe next weekend. And I think we'll skip a beta version > this time. > > I also though about, if that version turns out to be stable, we should > publish a 1.0 version. I had planned to make some fundamental changes > before 1.0, but now I think, maybe we should publish the 1.0 first, and > then make the big changes in a new 1.1 or 2.0 branch. So contrary to the > usual software practice, we would have a stable 1.0 ;-) > > One of the larger changes I had in mind was requiring Python 2.3 or 2.4 > (currently Webware is backward compatible down to Python 2.0!) and then > getting rid of a lot of workarounds and ballast and suboptimal code. But > this will also bring in new instability, so now I think this should be > done after version 1.0. Your thoughts?
Agreed with all. -Chuck ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Webware-discuss mailing list Webware-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webware-discuss
