WATKIN-JONES,ADAM (HP-UnitedKingdom,ex1) wrote: > I'm delurking to ask what is surely a daft question but here goes: if not > AspectJ, then what AOP toolkit are you using? > > (Obvious answer: having super programming-chops, you've written an AOP kit > yourself! In which case, is this something you may put into the public > domain!?)
The obvious answer is quite correct. Whether or not it will be opensourced is something that is yet to be determined. We've thought about it. The core of it is really generic, and entirely based on reflection/dynamic proxies. With JDK1.4 the overhead for that is so small that it's rather ok to apply it just about everywhere. And boy oh boy does it rock :-) It's so cool to have an object implement 10 interfaces but not have a single class implement more than 1... it's what code reuse ought to be like. /Rickard -- Rickard Öberg ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Two, two, TWO treats in one. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Webwork-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webwork-user
