Matt Baldree wrote: >>4) I needed the system as a whole to be proxy-based in order to do >>memorymanagement with object caches. Since AspectJ works on regular >>classes that wouldn't work (AFAIK). > > You can advise objects as well.
Hm.. not sure what this has to do with my 4 point. What I meant was that I really needed the proxy/object separation, as in EJB, in order to do memory management. I *don't* want my entire object graph to be in memory all the time. > Ok, I'm sure it makes sense for your project. But, I think that AspectJ will > become the defacto standard in the future. That is quite probable, sure. But I think there's enough room for more implementations than just AspectJ. /Rickard -- Rickard Öberg ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Webwork-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webwork-user
