Matt Baldree wrote: > What are you using instead of Aspect and why did you decide not to use it?
What I'm using is already answered in other posts, but why I didn't use it is for the following reasons: 1) the need for a proprietary compiler 2) the somewhat unwieldy language extensions in AspectJ 3) the inability to do runtime changes (everything in AspectJ is compiletime) 4) I needed the system as a whole to be proxy-based in order to do memorymanagement with object caches. Since AspectJ works on regular classes that wouldn't work (AFAIK). 5) I wanted to find out if it was possible to implement AOP using plain Java. That's about it I guess. /Rickard -- Rickard Öberg ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Gadgets, caffeine, t-shirts, fun stuff. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Webwork-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/webwork-user
