maarten@ubuntu:~/weatherlink$ python3 weewx_weatherlink -s 2020-07-07T12:00 
-e 2020-07-07T12:30
Use dates: 2020-07-07 12:00:00 - 2020-07-07 12:30:00
1 [1594116000] - [1594117800]: 2020-07-07 12:00:00 - 2020-07-07 12:30:00
Finding stations:



Op woensdag 8 juli 2020 om 21:22:33 UTC+2 schreef Bastiaan Meelberg:

> Thanks for testing.
>
> The 'problem' with api v2 is that it delivers a HUGE amount of data. With 
> my setup it works perfect, I can import months at the time.
>
> I think indeed of you different setup it is not working. Maybe a 
> question/answer that the program is showing bit of the data and asks if it 
> is the data the user wants to import.
>
> I added a 'print url' to the latest build, if you can try an import of a 
> short period, lets say 30 min and use the link to download the JSON data in 
> a web-browser. (The link is valid for a few minutes, due to the timestamp 
> in the signature) and post it.
>
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, July 8, 2020 at 9:10:36 PM UTC+2, Maarten van der Hoeven 
> wrote:
>>
>> If I change the code to (#2, #0 and #3 are the values in your code), the 
>> data is imported okay (except extratemp1). I guess it has something to do 
>> with my ISS not having ID=1, but ID=2. An my external temp sensor running 
>> on ID=3
>>
>> Find attached the resulting csv file
>>
>>         baro_data = weather_data['sensors'][2]['data'] #2
>>         iss_data = weather_data['sensors'][1]['data'] #0
>>         indoor_data = weather_data['sensors'][3]['data'] #3
>>
>>
>> Op dinsdag 7 juli 2020 om 21:33:57 UTC+2 schreef Bastiaan Meelberg:
>>
>>> Hi Maarten,
>>>
>>> If you want you can give the importer a try:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/grebleem/weewx_wl_import
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, July 7, 2020 at 1:09:34 PM UTC+2, Maarten van der Hoeven 
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Bastiaan,
>>>>
>>>> something I can test?
>>>>
>>>> Op zondag 5 juli 2020 14:02:38 UTC+2 schreef [email protected]:
>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry for that. 
>>>>>
>>>>> There was a  misunderstandings . Let's forget this conversation;)  
>>>>>
>>>>> -fp 
>>>>>
>>>>> Le samedi 4 juillet 2020 à 13:36:23 UTC+2, [email protected] a écrit :
>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, agree. I like the weather, I like programming, I like to 
>>>>>> cooperate. It's my current lack of python-knowledge that I want to 
>>>>>> contribute the best I can do right now, and that is testing both of your 
>>>>>> drivers. I dont see it as competition, and may the best win. Far from 
>>>>>> that. 
>>>>>> In the end, it's my small contribution to the community in testing two 
>>>>>> drivers, and make them both better working. In hoping that the user pick 
>>>>>> the driver it feels most comfortably with, or not. 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Op zaterdag 4 juli 2020 12:52:09 UTC+2 schreef Bastiaan Meelberg:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I just program what I need, because I like programming.
>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> Use my program (you all-ready did I see in you're driver ;-), or 
>>>>>>> don't use it. That is the good think of open source. 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Your importer is doing the calculation e.g. Fahrenheit to Celsius I 
>>>>>>> don't like that, weewx is way better in making the conversions. 
>>>>>>> Also I just want to import a date range and not have to figure out 
>>>>>>> my station_id. So I decided to make my own.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But feel free to make a better driver/importer. 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Saturday, July 4, 2020 at 12:38:54 PM UTC+2, Florentin Prevost 
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Like we work on the same functions for Wll driver. Why not to work 
>>>>>>>> together to developp the driver ? Each one developp the same code and 
>>>>>>>> it 
>>>>>>>> would a shame to work 2 times for the same code ...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"weewx-development" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-development/fdbe50d7-54f1-4f19-888b-669425c1a6b1n%40googlegroups.com.

Attachment: 92884.json
Description: application/json

Reply via email to