Interesting. I made a small change so the program will show the sensors found. It looks like the extra temp is dataset 0 (lets skip that for now), barometer is set 2, inside is set 3 and the remaining data is set 4. So like you figured out, this should give the correct data:
baro_data = weather_data['sensors'][2]['data'] > iss_data = weather_data['sensors'][4]['data'] > indoor_data = weather_data['sensors'][3]['data'] > > On Wednesday, July 8, 2020 at 9:53:38 PM UTC+2, Maarten van der Hoeven wrote: > > maarten@ubuntu:~/weatherlink$ python3 weewx_weatherlink -s > 2020-07-07T12:00 -e 2020-07-07T12:30 > Use dates: 2020-07-07 12:00:00 - 2020-07-07 12:30:00 > 1 [1594116000] - [1594117800]: 2020-07-07 12:00:00 - 2020-07-07 12:30:00 > Finding stations: > > > > Op woensdag 8 juli 2020 om 21:22:33 UTC+2 schreef Bastiaan Meelberg: > >> Thanks for testing. >> >> The 'problem' with api v2 is that it delivers a HUGE amount of data. With >> my setup it works perfect, I can import months at the time. >> >> I think indeed of you different setup it is not working. Maybe a >> question/answer that the program is showing bit of the data and asks if it >> is the data the user wants to import. >> >> I added a 'print url' to the latest build, if you can try an import of a >> short period, lets say 30 min and use the link to download the JSON data in >> a web-browser. (The link is valid for a few minutes, due to the timestamp >> in the signature) and post it. >> >> >> >> >> On Wednesday, July 8, 2020 at 9:10:36 PM UTC+2, Maarten van der Hoeven >> wrote: >>> >>> If I change the code to (#2, #0 and #3 are the values in your code), the >>> data is imported okay (except extratemp1). I guess it has something to do >>> with my ISS not having ID=1, but ID=2. An my external temp sensor running >>> on ID=3 >>> >>> Find attached the resulting csv file >>> >>> baro_data = weather_data['sensors'][2]['data'] #2 >>> iss_data = weather_data['sensors'][1]['data'] #0 >>> indoor_data = weather_data['sensors'][3]['data'] #3 >>> >>> >>> Op dinsdag 7 juli 2020 om 21:33:57 UTC+2 schreef Bastiaan Meelberg: >>> >>>> Hi Maarten, >>>> >>>> If you want you can give the importer a try: >>>> >>>> https://github.com/grebleem/weewx_wl_import >>>> >>>> Thanks. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tuesday, July 7, 2020 at 1:09:34 PM UTC+2, Maarten van der Hoeven >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Bastiaan, >>>>> >>>>> something I can test? >>>>> >>>>> Op zondag 5 juli 2020 14:02:38 UTC+2 schreef [email protected]: >>>>>> >>>>>> Sorry for that. >>>>>> >>>>>> There was a misunderstandings . Let's forget this conversation;) >>>>>> >>>>>> -fp >>>>>> >>>>>> Le samedi 4 juillet 2020 à 13:36:23 UTC+2, [email protected] a >>>>>> écrit : >>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes, agree. I like the weather, I like programming, I like to >>>>>>> cooperate. It's my current lack of python-knowledge that I want to >>>>>>> contribute the best I can do right now, and that is testing both of >>>>>>> your >>>>>>> drivers. I dont see it as competition, and may the best win. Far from >>>>>>> that. >>>>>>> In the end, it's my small contribution to the community in testing two >>>>>>> drivers, and make them both better working. In hoping that the user >>>>>>> pick >>>>>>> the driver it feels most comfortably with, or not. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Op zaterdag 4 juli 2020 12:52:09 UTC+2 schreef Bastiaan Meelberg: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I just program what I need, because I like programming. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Use my program (you all-ready did I see in you're driver ;-), or >>>>>>>> don't use it. That is the good think of open source. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Your importer is doing the calculation e.g. Fahrenheit to Celsius I >>>>>>>> don't like that, weewx is way better in making the conversions. >>>>>>>> Also I just want to import a date range and not have to figure out >>>>>>>> my station_id. So I decided to make my own. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> But feel free to make a better driver/importer. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Saturday, July 4, 2020 at 12:38:54 PM UTC+2, Florentin Prevost >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Like we work on the same functions for Wll driver. Why not to work >>>>>>>>> together to developp the driver ? Each one developp the same code and >>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>> would a shame to work 2 times for the same code ... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weewx-development" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-development/030685d7-1ad5-4fc6-af67-9812bf28a617o%40googlegroups.com.
