Hi Jan-Jaap,
I've just installed your driver. Whats the status now? Right now it neither
seems to backfill data nor store current data from UDP into the database.
Other Question:
@property
def archive_interval(self):
return 60
What purpose does this have and why is it hardcoded to 60? Shouldn't it
read and return
[StdArchive]
# If the station hardware supports data logging then the archive
interval
# will be downloaded from the station. Otherwise, specify it (in
seconds).
archive_interval = 300
from weewx.conf?
Jan-Jaap van der Geer schrieb am Donnerstag, 21. Januar 2021 um 21:06:51
UTC+1:
> On Thursday, January 21, 2021 at 6:53:11 PM UTC+1 [email protected]
> wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday, January 20, 2021 at 11:10:35 PM UTC-8 Jan-Jaap van der Geer
>> wrote:
>>
>>> > * if you're asking if there's some kind of hybrid UDP 'and/or' REST
>>> weewx driver...
>>>
>> I'm not asking that, but the latter is what I'm trying to create. Well,
>>> it's working though very much a WIP. However I have wondered as well if I
>>> should drop the UDP altogether and end up with a REST-only-driver. I
>>> haven't really decided on that yet. Maybe I'll make it configurable in an
>>> all-in-one driver.
>>>
>>>
>> Nobody's going to turn down having more drivers available :-)
>>
>
> No? :)
>
> I guess I could see a few options:
>>
>> 1. a REST-only driver
>> 2. a driver that is configurable UDP 'or' REST
>> 3. a driver that is smart enough to use REST to fill in UDP gaps
>> 4. or maybe even something like wunderfixer as a standalone utility
>> to fill in weewx gaps by comparing the db with the WF server data
>>
>> Never looked into wunderfixer but heard the name, sounds interesting. I
> suppose it isn't something general that works with the current drivers?
>
> Anyway, the goal is nr 3 although it will only look at the gaps since the
> last measurement, so not really gaps.
>
>
>> Power loss risk is easier. Buy a UPS. Put your Hub on it.
>>
>
> My hub is on an old 10.000 mAh battery. No idea how long of a power loss
> it would survive (but then that's not really a big issue usually here
> anyway). Hm, did I introduce a fire risc?
>
> Old posts on the WF Forums from their engineering said that the old
>> Air+Sky sensors could store 90-120 minutes if they can't reach their Hub.
>> The Hub stores 8 days of data if it can't reach WF servers. So if you're
>> concerned re: short outages then I'd UPS the Hub and ideally the weewx box
>> if you could. The new Tempest stations are similar enough those numbers
>> are probably reasonable for the current gear.
>>
>
> Ah, that's a lot more than I thought. I thought I'd seen something like 1h
> for the hub, and I was assuming nothing for the sensor. Sounds good!
>
> Personally I kinda like the idea of (1) and (4) at least initially, and
>> maybe (2) as a stretch goal.
>>
>
> Well, aiming for (3) for the time being... :-P
>
> Cheers,
> Jan-Jaap
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"weewx-development" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-development/6eba9cbe-64f8-4d35-8246-7cf02e09db6an%40googlegroups.com.
