On Wednesday, February 10, 2021 at 6:39:42 AM UTC+1 gjr80 wrote: > That's the good thing about WeeWX, everyone can contribute. If you believe > the documentation can be improved propose an amendment, preferably via a > pull request, though I expect for something simple Tom would consider a > request with suggested text in a post. >
I appreciate that but I'm afraid my understanding of this stuff is nowhere near good enough to come up with a good alternative text. I'm not even sure you agree with my conclusion... :) Cheers, Jan-Jaap On Wednesday, 10 February 2021 at 06:00:34 UTC+10 Jan-Jaap van der Geer > wrote: > >> On Tuesday, February 9, 2021 at 10:56:34 AM UTC+1 gjr80 wrote: >> >>> That being said there is no requirement for that to be so, hence why you >>> see words like ‘if’ and not ‘must’. >>> >> >> The 'if' concerns the if we're implementing the genArchiveRecords(), so >> that's a clear yes. Other than that it says 'should'. Agreed, that's not a >> 'must', but it is very close. Maybe that documentation could use a bit more >> info there assuming you're right that it's totally OK and usual not to >> implement the archive_interval property. >> >> Cheers, >> Jan-Jaap >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weewx-development" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-development/dccadaad-9fb2-45ad-b7c7-bff4e8f4475dn%40googlegroups.com.
