On Monday, December 12, 2016 at 7:57:16 PM UTC-5, ponolan wrote: > > For now I care more about avoiding gaps than higher resolution and > accuracy. It would certainly be interesting to see side-by-side data. >
sensors on the low-end hardware track pretty closely. unfortunately i do not have a co-located davis or rainwise station with which to compare... the low-end hardware and mid-range (davis, rainwise) differ in build quality. they all discolor and get brittle when exposed to uv. all of the uv sensors burn out faster than other sensors. spiders like to nest in a davis just as much as a fine offset. but the davis and rainwise build quality often means repair instead of replace. you'll also spend more time putzing to avoid data loss on the low-end hardware, whereas mid-range just works. i must say that tom's architectural decisions in weewx bring the low-end hardware much closer to mid-range performance, especially compared to the software that ships with the low-end stuff. m -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weewx-user" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
