On Sunday, January 27, 2019 at 12:31:54 AM UTC-5, torrin wrote: > > From what I have gleaned, the way to interface with the WS-2000 is by > capturing http calls from the WS-2000? Is this the correct approach (I > have pretty strong network controls and there is no easy way to > promiscuously monitor traffic without adding more gear (or until I get my > pfsense router set up)). >
have you browsed the weewx wiki? https://github.com/weewx/weewx/wiki there are two approaches that are known to work: option 1: weewx-interceptor. install the weewx-interceptor driver to capture the tcp/ip packets sent by the weather station. the readme in the weewx-interceptor code has extensive explanations about different ways to configure your network/devices to either listen or sniff the packets. there are a few guides in the weewx wiki that describe users' approaches to doing this. https://github.com/matthewwall/weewx-interceptor option 2: weewx-sdr. purchase a US$20 usb software-defined radio module to capture the signals from the station sensors. then use the weewx-sdr driver to capture the data from the sdr device. https://github.com/matthewwall/weewx-sdr here is a step-by-step guide that shows how to use the weewx-sdr driver: https://github.com/weewx/weewx/wiki/sdr-rpi-recipe finally, there is an outside chance that you can talk directly to the ws-2000 over tcp/ip. fine offset makes an older bridge device called the 'observer', and it will respond to certain network queries. aussiesusan reverse-engineered this protocol and wrote a driver to use it: https://github.com/AussieSusan/HP1000 you might want to poke at the ws-2000 to see if it supports the same or similar protocol. m -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weewx-user" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
