That is why I bought it, I never had the WS-2902 so I can't tell you if it is better in person, but no one with a WS-2000 has said "I wish I would have go the WS2902"
On Sunday, February 3, 2019 at 10:14:00 AM UTC-6, lobsey wrote: > > Thanks tor. That's what I had noticed. It sounds like Ambient WS-2000 is > worth the extra money for the better screen in your opinion? > > On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 4:43:36 PM UTC-6, [email protected] wrote: >> >> I read about 50 reviews of the 2902 and the WS-2000. The screen on the >> WS-2000 is just a ton better. The only down side, is you need a WS32B to >> get inside temp/humidity/barometer (it is included in the package). In >> some ways that is good, but it is something to think about. I have been >> quite happy with the WS-2000. >> >> On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 1:02:29 PM UTC-6, lobsey wrote: >>> >>> >>> Thanks tor... I've been following along here. I'm trying to decide >>> between the Ambient WS-2000 vs WS-2902 >>> <https://wxobservation.com/ambient-weather-ws-2000-vs-ws-2902/>. What >>> made you pick the WS-2000? I like the screen better, just not sure I can >>> justify spending the extra $100 bucks! >>> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weewx-user" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
