Having has the 2902A then bought the 2000 console, I'll say the 2000 is handsdown the winner. Both for the look and info available, and more importantly, the ease of setup. The awnet app isn't the easiest thing to use. It works, but it can be painful when it doesn't cooperate with your router.
On Sunday, February 3, 2019 at 11:14:00 AM UTC-5, lobsey wrote: > > Thanks tor. That's what I had noticed. It sounds like Ambient WS-2000 is > worth the extra money for the better screen in your opinion? > > On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 4:43:36 PM UTC-6, [email protected] wrote: >> >> I read about 50 reviews of the 2902 and the WS-2000. The screen on the >> WS-2000 is just a ton better. The only down side, is you need a WS32B to >> get inside temp/humidity/barometer (it is included in the package). In >> some ways that is good, but it is something to think about. I have been >> quite happy with the WS-2000. >> >> On Friday, February 1, 2019 at 1:02:29 PM UTC-6, lobsey wrote: >>> >>> >>> Thanks tor... I've been following along here. I'm trying to decide >>> between the Ambient WS-2000 vs WS-2902 >>> <https://wxobservation.com/ambient-weather-ws-2000-vs-ws-2902/>. What >>> made you pick the WS-2000? I like the screen better, just not sure I can >>> justify spending the extra $100 bucks! >>> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weewx-user" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
