Yes, thank you for that link, and Tom's related earlier post in the same thread indicated that he hadn't ruled it out. For a Rpi, Skyfield does seem a bit taxing and more trouble for weewx users than it's worth, not to mention the burden for our beloved developers!
On Sunday, March 31, 2019 at 3:18:07 PM UTC-4, Lloyd Brown wrote: > > Based on my Google search while trying to figure my pyephem problem - > Skyfield was discussed by Thomas Keefer and he did not want to transition > to it because of the dependencies. See > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/weewx-user/skyfield%7Csort:date/weewx-user/w8_v-ClMcPE/mGyF9dG8AQAJ > > On Sunday, March 31, 2019 at 10:57:25 AM UTC-6, V. Kelly Bellis wrote: >> >> Hi Lloyd, >> >> Glad you started this thread and that you're up and running the >> (deprecated) pyephem extension, v3.7.3.0 for python. Thanks to you, I also >> am running it! >> >> One tangential thing that I wondered about: Is weewx also able to utilize >> Brandon Rhodes' later work '*Skyfield* <https://rhodesmill.org/skyfield/>' >> ? >> >> >> >>>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weewx-user" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
