Good to know! I ordered the GW1000 yesterday - sounds like that's the best route.
And yes, using interceptor does clearly introduce too many moving parts, creating a fragile system. Guess I'll just have to be ok with not knowing what exactly was causing my issue. In any case, silver lining is that I learned a bunch in the process! Thanks all for the help and advice On Friday, January 24, 2020 at 8:24:45 AM UTC-6, G Hammer wrote: > > > > My experience with getting the data using Interceptor is that it's a pain. > I tried the DNS spoofing, setting up an AP on the weewx machine and > sniffing the data (worked best), iptables in my router. None were really > good as there were too many moving parts. I then used the SDR method and it > worked fine once the receiver was in just the right place. Then, as happens > with radio, a sensor was lost and never regained. > I found the GW1000 method and have not looked back. Dead simple. MWall has > written a driver for it. > > If you really just want to use the Interceptor network method, I'd suggest > simplifying your overall design then introduce additional items one at a > time. > > Me? I'm firmly in the simple camp with the GW1000. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "weewx-user" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/weewx-user/bc638437-052e-4bff-991d-cfce71d366ad%40googlegroups.com.
