Gianluca, Haven't had much time to look through the source. I do agree with you though. Perhaps using a higher level language would be a good idea. C# is particularly nice, but then you depend on the .net runtime. I have developed gtk apps in both C as well as C#. Perhaps using the gtkmm bindings would be a nice middle ground. I've been coding mostly in C++ these days anyway...
In any case, I'd look into things a bit more after the holidays. Best wishes for the new year. Alvaro On Sun, 2006-12-24 at 00:07 +0100, Gianluca Sforna wrote: > On 12/22/06, Alvaro A. Ramirez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Dave, > > > > Thanks for that. I'll have a look at the repository. I'd definitely like > > to get involved and get it to a better state. > > > > Just a random thought about this: if looking at repository you will > discover that the code base has to be mostly rewritten (not unlikely, > given that all efforts focused on the Qt interface), I'd like to > suggest an higher level language for the implementation, my personal > choice being python. > > I wish everybody an Happy Christmas and a successful new year > > Gianluca _______________________________________________ Wengophone-devel mailing list [email protected] http://dev.openwengo.com/mailman/listinfo/wengophone-devel
