Follow-up Comment #2, bug #9649 (project wesnoth):
Thanks, this kind of little detail are hard to spot but was expected, because
the code was a first very simple prototype which just worked fine in most
cases, so it stayed in this state.
I hope that I correctly understood you, but anyway this is already better. If
not, please tell me. You can also try the new behavior on the svn trunk to
verify if it's ok.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://gna.org/bugs/?9649>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Gna!
http://gna.org/
_______________________________________________
Wesnoth-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-bugs
