I agree. Besides which, I am pretty sure there is precedent. She should be given access.
John On Tue, 28 Mar 2006, David Philippi wrote: > Am Dienstag 28 März 2006 09:07 schrieb Richard Kettering: > > This is always a hard recruit, because it's not easy for us to judge > > the competency of the person at doing their job. SVN access is > > usually granted for competency at _other_ tasks, and not as an end in > > itself. Plus it's a catch-22 if they don't know off the bat. I only > > learned SVN by being given access to it. > > I don't consider this as a very hard recruit. In thise case the commit rights > will only be granted to commit stuff other devs approved. It's very easy to > see in the commit ml wheter she does other stuff and in the case of malicious > wrong commits - revert them and revoke her rights. One can not really destroy > anything in a SVN repository with mere commit rights, just cause a lot of > work in the worst case. > > Bye David > > _______________________________________________ > Wesnoth-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev > -- ------------------------------------------------------------------- "In theory, theory and practice are the same, but in practice they're different." ------------------------------------------------------------------- John W. C. McNabb ------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Wesnoth-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev
