Am Freitag 13 April 2007 schrieb Bruno Wolff III: > In the case at hand it is possible, that the copyright owner didn't realize > what licensing under the gpl really meant and didn't intend to do that.
I've seen no proof that he released it under the GPL. He put it into a GPL project but if he didn't explicitely put it under GPL then Adonthell is at fault for not making including a LICENSE.txt which states that this file is not under GPL. Compare it to Mozilla/Firefox with their redistribution problems due to the fact that the logo is only free to use within the official project and not patched versions. Bye David _______________________________________________ Wesnoth-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev
