Selon Bruno Wolff III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 20:51:33 -0400, > "Eric S. Raymond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Bruno Wolff III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Would it be possible to have the update script issue svn rename commands, > > > rather than just renaming files. I found it a bit annoying that svn > didn't > > > know the music files (in the test run) were just renamed and it > downloaded > > > fresh copies when I did an update. This was probably a worst case > scenario, > > > but even for text files it would still be nicer to avoid having to > redownload > > > files that have only (or mostly) just had name changes. > > > > upconvert doesn't actually do any fike renames. I did those myself using > > svn mv, If svn rename really has better semantics (something I had no idea > > about) I'll do that in the future. > > To the best of my understanding svn mv and svn rename are aliases for each > other. So it should have worked. My checkout should have been less than a > week > out of date, so I wouldn't have expected a big change that would have > required redownloading the files. Maybe it is a deficiancy in subversion. > I am also running svn 1.3.2, which isn't the latest version. But I would > have expect it to do this right. > > So it sounds like you did try to do things right, the command isn't really > part > of upconvert in any case, and something went wrong for me. (I don't know > if anyone else saw the same thing when they updated.) So there isn't anything > to change. >
AFAIK it wasn't just a rename, the files were modifed too (the metadata of the ogg files was updated). _______________________________________________ Wesnoth-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev
