On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 21:57:56 -0500, Bruno Wolff III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Going from 17007 to 17008 was a quick update to wesnoth-1.ogg. Going from > 17008 to 17009 involved downloading a fresh copy of wesnoth-1.ogg under > its new name. So this problem appears to be dumbness on the part of svn.
I didn't see the efficiency of rename listed as an issue by the svn project. The closest issue is making rename a real function rather than D+A. Just to make sure I am going to join their users list and try to get the issue on their tracking system. _______________________________________________ Wesnoth-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev
