On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 15:14:16 -0500, Bruno Wolff III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 14:42:16 -0400, > "Eric S. Raymond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Bruno Wolff III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > It's possible that I got both of these changes in one update. I have seen > > > binary files get updates instead of full replacements, but I don't know > > > how > > > smart the code is about matching the old and new versions of binary files. > > > > I just got a title from Zhaytee for wesnoth-1.ogg; he suggests we call it > > "Revelation". It will be interesting to see what the update pattern is > > when I make that change. > > I'll watch for the commit message and update to the rev before and then > update to that specific rev and report back what happened. > I should be able to try this tonight.
Going from 17007 to 17008 was a quick update to wesnoth-1.ogg. Going from 17008 to 17009 involved downloading a fresh copy of wesnoth-1.ogg under its new name. So this problem appears to be dumbness on the part of svn. _______________________________________________ Wesnoth-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev
