I agree. I see little use for separate and only marginally different traits, but much chance for confusion.
I am currently in the process of making some changes to TSG. Would this change be as simple as removing the custom traits? George aka Wintermute On 8/14/07, Lari Nieminen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > The South Guard defines custom versions of standard traits with slightly > > different characteristics. This doesn't seem like a good idea. The > "quick" > > definition has the old 10% penalty rather than the current 5% penalty. > > "strong" gives +2 damage and +2 hp instead of the current +1 damage and > +1 hp. > > I don't remember strong ever doing that exact combo, so it might be that > > the author wanted it to be stronger for the units it was given to or I > just > > might not remember when "strong" did that. > > Is there a good reason not to change the campaign to use the standard > macros > > for traits? > > Not really. I'd definitely rather have those duplicates removed and have > the standard traits be used instead. > > > -- > Lari Nieminen > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > +358443758373 > > _______________________________________________ > Wesnoth-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev > -- http://www.wesnoth.org/ The bureaucracy is expanding to meet the needs of the expanding bureaucracy. "With your head full of brains and your shoes full of feet, you're too smart to go down any not so good street." - D.S.
_______________________________________________ Wesnoth-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev
