Piotr Cychowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> As a totaly unrepresentative voice of Windows-using minority, after
> reading above, I'd go for WAF. I do appreciate that scons might be more
> stable, but I would not want to bring python into the process.
Um, WAF is also implemented in Python.
> Wrestling
> with windows ports of libraries we use is painful enough without adding
> another layer of things that might go wrong, might be incompatible with
> something or just be plain to heavy for some setups.
You should be far more frightened of cmake, then. Its C code is a *great*
deal more complex and heavyweight than both scons and WAF put together;
I can tell that just by looking at the feature lists.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>
_______________________________________________
Wesnoth-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev
