On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 01:09:31PM +0000, Mario Rodrÿffffedguez wrote: > Robert: I answered you perfectly to many questions in my last email [...]
You provided tangential replies to some things, only when it was convenient to you, and completely avoided the key issues that have been repeated several times in the whole thread, like: "I repeat, the problem is _your_ translation not having anything to do with Valencian. This is a language the RACV invented in the 70s and pretends to pass as if it were Valencian. Since the whole academical/scientifical world, the whole legal world and basically anything mainstream isn't following, I understand that its supporters (e.g. you) try to use Wesnoth (and other free software projects) as a means to expand their niche community." from https://mail.gna.org/public/wesnoth-dev/2008-10/msg00007.html Furthermore, instead of that you bring up the same flawed arguments over and over, like your ad hominem attack based on the TLD used by the website that hosts my reference list, which has its first instance here: https://mail.gna.org/public/wesnoth-dev/2008-10/msg00004.html then is repeatedly exposed as an ad hominem in: https://mail.gna.org/public/wesnoth-dev/2008-10/msg00007.html https://mail.gna.org/public/wesnoth-dev/2008-10/msg00012.html and after a few days you bring it up again: https://mail.gna.org/public/wesnoth-dev/2008-10/msg00025.html (last paragraph) and the same happens for most of the statements you're making. At this point I don't think it's possible to sustain a reasonable conversation with you. -- Robert Millan The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all." _______________________________________________ Wesnoth-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev
