I'm in favor of a move to github as well On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Mark de Wever <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 03:50:57PM +0100, Iurii Chernyi wrote: > > Hello! > > > > Here at FOSDEM we were again talked about moving away from gna > > bugracker and gna-hosted svn to our own bugtracker and github-hosted > > git. > > GNA is not maintained and it's better to do the move now, at our > > leisure, than later, when we might be forced to do it due to an > > outage. > > > > This time it seems that there are no major obstacles preventing us > > from the move, and anyone who wishes to continue using SVN (e.g. for > > partial checkouts) can still do it as github supports it (see > > https://github.com/blog/966-improved-subversion-client-support ). > > > > WIP details available on http://wiki.wesnoth.org/WesnothGIT > > > > So far there's no timeline for the move, but we're already testing the > > bugtracker export/import script and svn-to-git conversion of wesnoth's > > repository (both based on the tools provided by esr) > > > > Comments are welcome. > > As said at the FOSDEM, I'm in favour of moving to Github. > > -- > Regards, > Mark de Wever aka Mordante/SkeletonCrew > > _______________________________________________ > Wesnoth-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev >
_______________________________________________ Wesnoth-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/wesnoth-dev
