Karl Eichwalder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I guess, you as the wget maintainer switched from something > supported to the unsupported "betaX" scheme and now we have > something to talk about ;)
I had no idea that something as usual as "betaX" was unsupported. In fact, I believe that "bX" was added when Francois saw me using it in Wget. :-) > Using something different then exactly "wget-1.9-b3.de.po" will > confuse the robot <sigh> >> Returning an error that says "your version number is unparsable to >> this piece of software, you must use one of <...> instead" would be >> more correct in the long run. > > Sure. You should have receive a message like this, didn't you? I didn't. Maybe it was an artifact of robot not having worked at the time, though.
