Zitat von Mauro Tortonesi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > The timestamping issues I reported in above mentioned message are now also > > repaired by the patch you mailed last week here. > > Only the small *cosmetic* issue remains that it *always* says: > > Remote file is newer, retrieving. > > even if there is no local file yet. >
> i have been working on the problem you reported for the last couple of days. > i've just committed a patch that should fix it for good. could you please try > the new HTTP code and tell me if it works properly? > Hi Mauro, I have now tested the new wget 1.11 beta1 on my Linux system and the above issue is solved now. The "Remote file is newer" message now only appears when the local file exists and most of the other logic with time-stamping and file-naming works like expected. I meanwhile found, however, another new problem with time-stamping, which mainly occurs in connection with a proxy-cache, I will report that in a new thread. Same for a small problem with the SSL configuration. Thanks for the continuing work on my most-used utility ;-) J.Roderburg
