On 10/30/07, Micah Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > Tony Godshall wrote: > > Perhaps the little wget could be called "wg". A quick google and > > wikipedia search shows no real namespace collisions. > > To reduce confusion/upgrade problems, I would think we would want to > ensure that the "traditional"/little Wget keeps the current name, and > any snazzified version gets a new one.
Please not another -ng. How about wget2 (since we're on 1.x). And the current one remains in 1.x. And then eventually everyone's gotten used to used to and can't live without the new bittorrent-like almost-multithreaded features. ;-) Tony
